Print
 
 

Son misleads father into signing over his assets

Published: February 22, 2010

The plaintiff, a 92-year-old father of three sons, resides in a nursing home due to physical impairments caused by a 2008 stroke.

In early 2008, while the plaintiff was rehabilitating from the stroke, two of his sons engaged the services of an elder law attorney regarding financial planning in connection with Medicaid eligibility.

At the initial meeting with the attorney, it was discovered through an intake form that many of the plaintiff's assets were no longer in his name but instead were in the name of the third son. The assets included his home and a number of brokerage accounts.

It was also discovered that the value of the plaintiff's estate was significantly less than what he believed it to be.

The case was complicated due to a number of factors - most significantly, that many of the alleged fraudulent transactions occurred decades ago.

The jury-waived case was tried over 11 days. The court found that the third son abused his relationship of trust and confidence with his father - including misrepresenting himself as having worked for the IRS - by misleading him into signing financial documents and actively striving to conceal what he had done from the other family members.

The case was complicated by the fact that the plaintiff could not testify at trial. In addition, since the precipitant events occurred in the early 1980s and 1990s, problems of proof abounded throughout the discovery process.

Detailed Information

Type: Verdict for plaintiff(s)
Total Value: $2,630,000.00
Verdict/Settlement Date: 11/17/2009
Type of Action: Wills & Trusts
Court: Norfolk Superior Court (MA)
Case Number: 08-01831
Caption: Sacchetti v. Sacchetti
Plaintiff(s)   v.   Defendants(s)
Sacchetti   Sacchetti
Injuries Alleged: Financial loss
Tried Before: Judge
Judge or Mediator or Arbitrator: Other (Patrick T. Brady)
 
Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s)
Lead Attorney: India L. Minchoff
Firm: (Boston)
 
Other Attorney: Stephen J. Kuzman
Firm: (Boston)
 
Attorney(s) for Defendant(s)
No defendant attorneys
 
Insurance Carrier(s)
No insurance companies involved
 
Plaintiff(s) Expert(s)
No plaintiff experts
 
Defendant(s) Expert(s)
No defendant experts